Hyperliquid faces fairness questions as Wintermute wins 76% of auctions

The payment rail for your crypto. One card. Every chain. No KYC. Spend with Apple Pay or Google Pay in 180+ countries.

Crypto market maker Wintermute has secured roughly 76% of Hyperliquid’s highest-priority data auctions over the past month, raising questions about whether the exchange’s paid early-access system gives large trading firms an advantage over smaller participants.

Summary

Wintermute-linked wallets won roughly 76% of Hyperliquid’s highest priority data auctions over the past month, according to Loris Tools.
The auction system allows traders to pay for early access to incoming order data, giving their algorithms milliseconds to adjust trades before execution.
DRW founder Don Wilson questioned the system’s fairness and regulatory implications, while Wintermute and Hyperliquid defended its transparency.
The scrutiny comes as Hyperliquid expands into traditional asset derivatives and ICE pursues regulated US perpetual futures using its technology.

According to a Bloomberg report citing blockchain analytics platform Loris Tools, a wallet linked to Wintermute won more than three-quarters of auctions for the top data slot, which allows traders to see incoming orders milliseconds before they are processed.

The system lets trading firms bid for faster access to order information, giving their algorithms additional time to adjust quotes or hedge positions on other exchanges before trades are executed.

Wintermute declined to confirm its share of auction wins or disclose how much it spends on the service. Its founder and CEO, Evgeny Gaevoy, said the firm primarily uses the mechanism for cryptocurrency trading rather than derivatives linked to traditional financial assets.

How Hyperliquid’s priority data auctions work

Hyperliquid operates a decentralized exchange where traders can buy and sell perpetual futures without relying on a conventional centralized exchange operator.

Unlike traditional futures, perpetual contracts have no expiration date, allowing traders to maintain positions as long as they meet the required margin conditions.

Under Hyperliquid’s priority data auction system, participants compete for earlier access to information about orders waiting to be processed.

You might also like: Bitcoin price falls 4%, can BTC recover above $70,000?

Winning a higher-priority slot gives a trading algorithm a small timing advantage. Market makers can use that information to update their buy and sell prices or place offsetting trades elsewhere before the incoming orders are executed.

The exchange separately allows participants to pay for priority when processing their own orders. The two mechanisms serve different purposes, with one governing access to information and the other affecting execution priority.

Hyperliquid’s developer, Singapore-based Hyperliquid Labs, defended the auction system, saying participation is open to everyone and payments are publicly recorded onchain.

“Priority fees make latency competition open and transparent,” a spokesperson told Bloomberg.

Gaevoy similarly argued that paying for speed is already common in traditional financial markets, where sophisticated trading firms spend heavily on specialized infrastructure.

“Firms invest in low latency networks, microwave towers and colocation,” he said, explaining that developing such systems requires considerable money, time and expertise.

He described Hyperliquid’s auctions as a more transparent alternative because participants can see how priority is awarded and what firms pay.

Fairness concerns emerge as Hyperliquid attracts Wall Street

The concentration of auction wins has prompted questions about whether smaller traders can compete effectively with firms that have substantial financial and technological resources.

Don Wilson, founder of trading firm DRW Holdings, questioned the arrangement in an Oct. 31 post on X, comparing it with traditional exchanges where firms compete for faster access by placing servers close to trading infrastructure.

Wilson questioned whether Hyperliquid’s approach was fairer than conventional exchange arrangements and expressed doubts about how US regulators would view the practice.

The debate follows Hyperliquid’s expansion beyond cryptocurrency derivatives into perpetual contracts tied to equities, commodities and stock indexes.

In September, the exchange’s open interest surpassed $18 billion, with trading activity spanning both cryptocurrency contracts and markets based on traditional assets.

Hyperliquid’s market infrastructure has attracted interest from established financial companies seeking to introduce similar products under US regulatory oversight.

On Oct. 29, Intercontinental Exchange, the parent company of the New York Stock Exchange, announced a partnership with Trade.xyz to develop regulated US perpetual futures markets using Hyperliquid technology.

The proposed business would offer contracts tied to cryptocurrencies, equities, commodities, currencies and indexes, with access through participating futures brokers.

ICE plans to operate the regulated markets and make a strategic investment in Trade.xyz. The arrangement remains subject to regulatory approvals, including permission from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

It remains unclear whether Hyperliquid’s existing priority data auction mechanism would be used in the proposed US trading venue.

Separately, Kraken parent Payward has outlined plans for regulated Hyperliquid-based perpetual futures through Bitnomial and NinjaTrader Clearing.

Under that proposal, Bitnomial would administer the markets and handle clearing and settlement, while NinjaTrader Clearing would maintain customer accounts. Participation would be restricted to approved customers through permissioned markets.

Read more: Crypto market sees brief relief after cooler US PPI data 24h Volume $1,114,080,551 Market Cap $17,561,384,205 24h Low/High $69.92 / $75.19 24h 4.48% 7d -5.49%

US crypto regulation hub

Crypto mining in the US: federal rules and the state map

Crypto kiosk rules by state: bans, licenses and the fraud data

Crypto ETF rules in the US: how a fund gets listed now

Crypto banking access in the US: master accounts, the chokepoint, and what changed

CFTC and crypto in 2026: what the agency now governs

Is crypto legal in the US? Yes, and here is the structure

Crypto executive orders: what the White House has actually ordered

SEC crypto enforcement in 2026: from registration war to fraud beat

IRS crypto tax rules in 2026: what actually gets taxed

The OCC and crypto: national trust charters, explained

View all