MARKETSBTC $73,799.00 -1.35%ETH $2,060.78 -2.81%BNB $679.24 -1.71%XRP $1.06 -4.24%SOL $82.79 -3.93%DOGE $0.067795 -3.31%ADA $0.174124 -2.92%AVAX $8.49 +0.01%Prices are for reference only, not investment advice

Across Protocol restores website after phishing attack, $350K in estimated losses

Across Protocol restores website after phishing attack, $350K in estimated lossesRailThe payment rail for your crypto. One card. Every chain. No KYC. Spend with Apple Pay or Google Pay in 180+ countries.

Across Protocol has restored its website following a November 10 domain hijacking attack that redirected users to a fraudulent page, with security researchers estimating that approximately $350,000 was stolen from cryptocurrency wallets.

Summary
  • Across Protocol restored its website after attackers hijacked its domain through a reported Namecheap social engineering attack.
  • GoPlus estimated nearly $350,000 in losses across six blockchain networks following the phishing incident.
  • Attackers reportedly used malicious token approvals and permit signatures to access users’ cryptocurrency wallets.
  • Across confirmed that API users and third-party integrations were unaffected by the website compromise.
  • The protocol promised to compensate affected users and release a detailed report on the attack.

In a Wednesday update, the cross-chain bridge confirmed that its domain was back under its control and all systems were operating normally. The team attributed the attack to social engineering involving domain registrar Namecheap and promised to compensate affected users.

“All affected users will be made whole. We’ll share a full post-mortem in the coming days,” Across stated.

Security firm GoPlus estimated that the phishing operation affected wallets across Ethereum, Arbitrum, Base, BNB Chain, Ink and Plasma. Across has not disclosed its own confirmed loss figure or the total number of affected users.

Across is fully restored, and all systems are operational.https://t.co/PbkNxHeM6z is back under our control, and all Across systems are working normally.

Thank you to the Namecheap founder, @synth for responding on X, helping us secure our account and opening an investigation… https://t.co/i34WMbwEBg

— Across (@AcrossProtocol) November 11, 2026

Across Protocol says attackers gained control through Namecheap

The incident began at approximately 18:45 UTC on November 10, when an attacker gained unauthorized control of the Across domain following what the protocol described as a social engineering attack targeting Namecheap.

Rather than exploiting the bridge’s smart contracts, the attacker manipulated the website’s domain settings and directed visitors to a phishing page designed to resemble the legitimate service.

In its incident disclosure, Across said it received an alert within 15 minutes and immediately began working to shut down the compromised website.

Security response group SEAL911 helped flag across.to as a phishing site with major cryptocurrency wallets. Cloudflare subsequently classified the domain as dangerous before removing its DNS records, preventing visitors from reaching the fraudulent page.

The measures were taken while the protocol worked to regain control of its domain registrar account. Across temporarily suspended its frontend and API services during the recovery process.

At that stage, the team said Namecheap had not responded to its requests for assistance. However, its subsequent announcement thanked Namecheap founder Richard Kirkendall for helping secure the account and opening an investigation.

Across maintained that its domain had been protected by established security controls and said the circumstances surrounding the unauthorized takeover would be examined in its post-incident report.

Phishing attack reportedly drains $350K from user wallets

The estimated losses stemmed from transactions and permissions obtained through the fraudulent website during the period when attackers controlled the domain.

According to GoPlus, users who interacted with the phishing page could have been persuaded to sign EIP-2612 permits, Permit2 authorizations or direct token approvals.

Such permissions can allow an approved spender to transfer tokens from a wallet without requiring the owner to authorize every subsequent transaction.

In some cases, victims may have been persuaded to send cryptocurrency directly to addresses controlled by the attacker.

GoPlus identified several suspicious spender addresses associated with the incident and advised users to examine permissions granted during the attack.

The reported $350,000 loss estimate covers multiple blockchain networks, although Across has not independently confirmed the figure.

The team said users who accessed its website before the attack were not affected. Its statement further clarified that third-party integrations and API users were unaffected by the domain compromise.

The attack follows a separate series of DeFi website hijackings reported on October 31, when security firm Blockaid identified at least 12 websites serving the Step Drainer phishing toolkit.

Those incidents included Flap, which confirmed that a DNS attack had redirected visitors from its legitimate website to an unauthorized destination.

Across promises compensation as users check wallet approvals

Following the restoration, Across confirmed that its services were operational and advised potentially affected users to inspect their wallets for suspicious permissions.

In its security guidance, the team directed users who connected wallets during the attack to Revoke.cash to review and revoke authorizations granted on November 10.

Revoking an approval prevents further transfers using that permission, although it cannot reverse transactions that have already occurred.

Users who signed malicious permits may need to take additional precautions because some off-chain signatures can remain usable even when they do not appear among ordinary token approvals.

Across advised affected users to contact its official account with transaction details, including wallet addresses and transaction hashes, while warning against unsolicited messages impersonating its representatives.

The protocol said temporary browser and wallet phishing warnings could remain visible after the website’s restoration.

A separate Cloudflare-related phishing incident in October involved compromised API credentials that allowed attackers to send fraudulent messages appearing to originate from hardware wallet manufacturer Foundation.

Foundation said the incident affected its communication infrastructure but did not compromise customers’ hardware wallets or stored funds.

Across previously suffered a separate cross-chain security incident

The November phishing attack is separate from a July incident involving Across Protocol’s Risk Labs-operated relayer on Solana.

As crypto.news previously reported, attackers fabricated 1,627 Solana deposit events with a combined stated value of $41.7 million.

The relayer processed 581 fraudulent requests before suspending operations, resulting in a net loss of less than $4 million after accounting for trapped attacker funds.

Unlike that incident, the November attack targeted the protocol’s website domain and the wallet permissions of visitors who interacted with the fraudulent page.

Data from DefiLlama placed Across among the leading cross-chain bridges by transaction activity, with approximately $5.9 billion in transfers recorded over the preceding 30 days.

Across said its investigation into the November domain takeover remains ongoing and that it will release a detailed post-mortem explaining how the attacker gained control.

Read more: Is Ethereum price at risk as Foundation-linked wallet sells more ETH?

US crypto regulation hub

Crypto mining in the US: federal rules and the state map

Crypto kiosk rules by state: bans, licenses and the fraud data

Crypto ETF rules in the US: how a fund gets listed now

Crypto banking access in the US: master accounts, the chokepoint, and what changed

CFTC and crypto in 2026: what the agency now governs

Is crypto legal in the US? Yes, and here is the structure

Crypto executive orders: what the White House has actually ordered

SEC crypto enforcement in 2026: from registration war to fraud beat

IRS crypto tax rules in 2026: what actually gets taxed

The OCC and crypto: national trust charters, explained

View all

Deep Dives

The Bitcoin inheritance gap between a will and a wallet - 1 Feature Read more - The Bitcoin inheritance gap between a will and a wallet

The Bitcoin inheritance gap between a will and a wallet

Bitcoin BTC Bitcoin 23 hours ago
Can you still withdraw from Base or Arbitrum if the sequencer goes down? - 2 Feature Read more - Can you still withdraw from Base or Arbitrum if the sequencer goes down?

Can you still withdraw from Base or Arbitrum if the sequencer goes down?

23 hours ago
Inside a Visa card payment that settles in USDC - 3 Feature Read more - Inside a Visa card payment that settles in USDC

Inside a Visa card payment that settles in USDC

23 hours ago
How small deposits drained 77 ACryptoS vaults and what users can still withdraw - 4 Feature Read more - How small deposits drained 77 ACryptoS vaults and what users can still withdraw

How small deposits drained 77 ACryptoS vaults and what users can still withdraw

2 days ago
Ethereum put Glamsterdam’s Hoodi fork on hold. What did auditors find? - 5 Feature Read more - Ethereum put Glamsterdam’s Hoodi fork on hold. What did auditors find?

Ethereum put Glamsterdam’s Hoodi fork on hold. What did auditors find?

Ethereum ETH Ethereum 2 days ago
What happens to Solana validators that miss the Agave 4.4.1 upgrade? - 6 Feature Read more - What happens to Solana validators that miss the Agave 4.4.1 upgrade?

What happens to Solana validators that miss the Agave 4.4.1 upgrade?

2 days ago
Can crypto recover if US inflation keeps rate hike bets alive? - 7 Feature Read more - Can crypto recover if US inflation keeps rate hike bets alive?

Can crypto recover if US inflation keeps rate hike bets alive?

2 days ago
Why did the ED raid CoinDCX and Delta Exchange? What users should know - 8 Feature Read more - Why did the ED raid CoinDCX and Delta Exchange? What users should know

Why did the ED raid CoinDCX and Delta Exchange? What users should know

3 days ago
Can companies stop third parties trading tokenized US shares? - 9 Feature Read more - Can companies stop third parties trading tokenized US shares?

Can companies stop third parties trading tokenized US shares?

4 days ago
Binance recovery, US crypto bill talks, Bitcoin ETF exits | Weekly recap - 10 Recap Read more - Binance recovery, US crypto bill talks, Bitcoin ETF exits | Weekly recap

Binance recovery, US crypto bill talks, Bitcoin ETF exits | Weekly recap

4 days ago
Gnosis Pay discloses customer data breach ahead of Dec. 20 closure - 11 News Read more - Gnosis Pay discloses customer data breach ahead of Dec. 20 closure

Gnosis Pay discloses customer data breach ahead of Dec. 20 closure

5 days ago
French bank Crédit Mutuel Arkéa hit by $133M cyberattack, funds may have moved to crypto News Read more - French bank Crédit Mutuel Arkéa hit by $133M cyberattack, funds may have moved to crypto

French bank Crédit Mutuel Arkéa hit by $133M cyberattack, funds may have moved to crypto

6 days ago
GitBook urges token resets after AI-powered cyberattack - 12 News Read more - GitBook urges token resets after AI-powered cyberattack

GitBook urges token resets after AI-powered cyberattack

1 week ago
Source: crypto.newsOriginal URL: crypto.news